<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am so glad I bought that GOOG!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katherinedruckman.com/2007/05/31/i-am-so-glad-i-bought-that-goog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katherinedruckman.com/2007/05/31/i-am-so-glad-i-bought-that-goog/</link>
	<description>My insights, opinions and ponderings</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Yoo</title>
		<link>http://www.katherinedruckman.com/2007/05/31/i-am-so-glad-i-bought-that-goog/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Yoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katherinedruckman.com/?p=69#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The problem with Google stock is that it isn't appreciating like it once was... from http://tinyurl.com/27go7s

2004: Up 126.8%, from the offering price of $85 to $192.79. 

2005: Up 115.2% to $414.86. 

2006: Up 11.0% to $460.48. 

2007: Up 1.5%, as of April 12. 


Its not the same stock it used to be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Google stock is that it isn&#8217;t appreciating like it once was&#8230; from <a href="http://tinyurl.com/27go7s" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/27go7s</a></p>
<p>2004: Up 126.8%, from the offering price of $85 to $192.79. </p>
<p>2005: Up 115.2% to $414.86. </p>
<p>2006: Up 11.0% to $460.48. </p>
<p>2007: Up 1.5%, as of April 12. </p>
<p>Its not the same stock it used to be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
